LeewayHertz vs DataArt: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
LeewayHertz (4.1/5) edges ahead of DataArt (3.9/5) overall. LeewayHertz is the better choice for buyers wanting broad AI service coverage in one vendor. DataArt is the stronger option for enterprises in finance or healthcare needing AI at global scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
LeewayHertz vs DataArt: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | LeewayHertz | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1997 |
| HQ | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Team size | 150-300 | 5,700+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition | Nearly 30 years of engineering history across 30-plus global delivery locations |
| Pricing model | Fixed project or dedicated team | Dedicated team or retainer |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Python, PyTorch, OpenAI API | Python, AWS, Azure |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Manufacturing | Financial services, Healthcare, Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality |
LeewayHertz vs DataArt: overview
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz has operated out of San Francisco since 2007, though its ownership structure changed in September 2024 when The Hackett Group acquired the company. That acquisition matters for anyone evaluating long-term strategic direction, since it now answers to a larger consulting parent rather than operating fully independently. Public employee figures have also moved in different directions across sources and time, from around 300 in earlier reporting down to roughly 182 by mid-2026, worth checking directly given how much content marketing the firm publishes relative to its actual team size.
DataArt
DataArt goes back to 1997, founded by Eugene Goland, and is headquartered in New York City with roughly 5,700 employees spread across more than 30 locations in the US, Europe, the UK, Latin America, and the UAE. The firm delivers data, analytics, and AI platforms for finance, media and entertainment, healthcare and life sciences, retail, and travel and hospitality clients. Nearly three decades of history gives it a longer track record than almost every other firm here, though AI is delivered as part of a broader software engineering practice rather than a standalone specialty.
Services and capabilities: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
| Capability | LeewayHertz | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Machine learning | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
| Framework / platform | LeewayHertz | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| PyTorch | ✓ | N/A |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
| Criterion | LeewayHertz | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Dedicated team, Retainer |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
| Dimension | LeewayHertz | DataArt |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce | Financial services, Healthcare, Media & entertainment |
| Best use cases | Consolidating several AI workstreams under a single vendor relationship., Working with a firm now backed by a larger consulting parent for enterprise credibility. | Building AI-driven analytics platforms for finance or healthcare clients with strict compliance needs., Running a long-term AI and data engineering program with a financially established vendor. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
LeewayHertz vs DataArt: pros and cons
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | Broad service coverage spanning generative AI, machine learning, and AI agents under one roof. |
| + | The Hackett Group acquisition adds access to a larger consulting and benchmarking network. |
| + | Close to two decades of operating history predating the current AI boom. |
| + | High volume of published technical writing makes its methodology easy to evaluate before hiring. |
| - | Now owned by The Hackett Group as of 2024, which may shift its long-term positioning |
| - | Reported headcount has fallen by roughly half across recent public data, worth confirming directly |
| DataArt | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly three decades of software engineering history, among the longest reviewed here. |
| + | 5,700-plus employees across 30-plus locations globally. |
| + | Named industry focus areas (finance, healthcare, travel) show real vertical depth. |
| + | Data and analytics platform experience supports AI work that needs solid data foundations. |
| - | AI sits inside a much broader software engineering practice rather than being the firm's core identity |
| - | Enterprise scale typically means slower onboarding than smaller, more agile AI boutiques |
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
A typical fit: consolidating several AI workstreams under a single vendor relationship.
Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Manufacturing.
Who should choose DataArt?
A typical fit: building AI-driven analytics platforms for finance or healthcare clients with strict compliance needs.
Nearly 30 years of engineering history across 30-plus global delivery locations. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality.
Decision matrix: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | LeewayHertz |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | LeewayHertz |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: LeewayHertz (Not disclosed) vs DataArt (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | LeewayHertz |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
| Use case | LeewayHertz fit | DataArt fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidating several AI workstreams under a single vendor relationship. | Strong | Limited | LeewayHertz |
| Working with a firm now backed by a larger consulting parent for enterprise credibility. | Strong | Limited | LeewayHertz |
| Building AI-driven analytics platforms for finance or healthcare clients with strict compliance needs. | Limited | Strong | DataArt |
| Running a long-term AI and data engineering program with a financially established vendor. | Limited | Strong | DataArt |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: LeewayHertz vs DataArt
LeewayHertz (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Development projects. Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition.
DataArt (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need running a long-term AI and data engineering program with a financially established vendor. If your situation matches that, DataArt is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
LeewayHertz vs DataArt FAQ
Is LeewayHertz better than DataArt?
LeewayHertz (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. LeewayHertz's strongest advantage: broad service coverage spanning generative AI, machine learning, and AI agents under one roof. DataArt's strongest advantage: nearly three decades of software engineering history, among the longest reviewed here.
How do LeewayHertz and DataArt differ in pricing?
LeewayHertz uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. DataArt uses dedicated team or retainer pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: LeewayHertz or DataArt?
LeewayHertz is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each firm before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between LeewayHertz and DataArt?
LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition. DataArt's primary differentiator is: nearly 30 years of engineering history across 30-plus global delivery locations. They also differ in team size (150-300 vs 5,700+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each firm before making a decision.